Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mozart's Jupiter

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • painter_mindscapes
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael View Post
    Without the Jupiter, there would have been no Eroica, Fifth or Ninth.
    When I listen to those of LvB, I don't hear any resemblances to Jupiter. In movements, notes, or tempo. What are you basing this on?

    Mozart and LvB only met once briefly in Vienna. When LvB uses pieces of others in his works usually he left a note in the margin like "from Hayden's xxxx" or something similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sorrano
    replied
    Originally posted by painter_mindscapes View Post
    ...
    This is the kind of posting that we don't need. You are sounding like a troll.

    Leave a comment:


  • painter_mindscapes
    replied
    Originally posted by Sorrano View Post
    Personally, I find the opening rather exciting and powerful, both looking to the future as well as the past. Of all the Mozart symphonies it is my favorite opening.
    Why do you find it that way? exciting as in anticipation? is the the tempo? notes? can you clarify why?
    Last edited by painter_mindscapes; 04-05-2012, 03:41 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • painter_mindscapes
    replied
    Edited to remove excessive vulgarity - Chris

    Leave a comment:


  • Roehre
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael View Post
    Without the Jupiter, there would have been no Eroica, Fifth or Ninth.
    I am afraid I disagree.
    The seminal Mozart symphony -re its influence on Beethoven's 2nd- is the Prague, no.38 KV504. Contrary to the general thought that the 1788-trilogy contains the best of symphonic Mozart, it is KV504 which is the real symphonic masterwork of Mozart's:
    -the longest 1st mvt (the longest symphonic mvt before the Eroica 1st mvt even)
    -the most extensive development sections
    -the symphony which did cost Mozart by far the most trouble to conceive (the one symphony of which quite a lot of sketches do exist, including a couple of discarded ideas)

    Without the Jupiter Beethoven's symphonies are conceivable, without the Prague they aren't.

    Leave a comment:


  • Preston
    replied
    Philip, in all honesty - good to hear from you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sorrano
    replied
    Originally posted by painter_mindscapes View Post
    I'm tired of reading all of the egghead's in ivory tower accolades and want to know what do real people think about this music. Especially the first few bars.

    I find it lacking in power as the opening hook is weak.

    thx
    Personally, I find the opening rather exciting and powerful, both looking to the future as well as the past. Of all the Mozart symphonies it is my favorite opening.

    Leave a comment:


  • PDG
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael View Post

    Without the Jupiter, there would have been no Eroica, Fifth or Ninth.
    A surprising assertion from you, Michael! I don't think I agree at all...

    Leave a comment:


  • Quijote
    replied
    Originally posted by painter_mindscapes View Post
    I'm tired of reading all of the egghead's in ivory tower accolades and want to know what do real people think about this music. Especially the first few bars.

    I find it lacking in power as the opening hook is weak.

    thx
    I swore I would not come back to this forum (unless for the LvB teasers), but Painter Mindscapes' posting has made me do so.
    I am possibly an egghead ivory tower resident, so I must forgo my opinion of planetary symphonies.
    However, as a non egghead ivory tower resident (therefore a "real person" according to the blogger in question) in terms of the plastic and film/video arts, I would like to make disparaging comments about Mindscapes' recent posting involving the nude pole dancer (on the "What are you listening to now" thread) and the earlier posting of his/her film shot in Death Valley (whose exact title and rationale escapes me). Trouble is, I find him/her so boring and boorish that I can't be bothered to track down those precise postings in order to respond to them. All I can say at this juncture to Painter Mindscapes is to urge him/her not to give up the day job.
    I thank Michael (our resident Beethoven freak, non egghead and park bench resident) for his intelligent critique of the Jupiter, as well as the comments by Peter and Chris (both part-time eggheads and real people). And not forgetting Preston (who is beyond rational definition, this being a good thing).
    I hope this is not a posting that merits my banning.
    Greetings to other forum members (past, lurking and present),
    Philip
    Last edited by Quijote; 04-04-2012, 08:54 PM. Reason: I forgot to add Preston's contribution. Apologies, Preston.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Originally posted by Chris View Post
    Ah, that's one of my favorite Haydn works!

    For what it's worth, I do like the Jupiter Symphony quite a bit, but I prefer No. 40. If somebody asked me for one Mozart symphony to listen to, I would say that one.
    Great as it is, the 40th is rather too hackneyed for me, a bit like the Beethoven 5th! I prefer the 39th, it's so full of Joie de vivre - I particularly like Mozart's Eb works; the piano concertos in that key and the overture to the Magic flute all seem to share this quality. Without checking I think the lovely clarinet trio is also in Eb?

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    as does Haydn's no.48 'Maria Theresa
    Ah, that's one of my favorite Haydn works!

    For what it's worth, I do like the Jupiter Symphony quite a bit, but I prefer No. 40. If somebody asked me for one Mozart symphony to listen to, I would say that one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Originally posted by painter_mindscapes View Post
    I picked it because I read many reviews that say this is the 'ultimate' Mozart symphony and was coined 'Jupiter'. I listen to it and don't 'get it' so maybe others do who can explain why without a lot of musicologist verbiage.
    Well I can understand your argument with it being the 'ultimate' Mozart symphony, when in fact the last 3 symphonies are in their different ways a synthesis of various styles. The C major looks back to the spirit of the Baroque as does Haydn's no.48 'Maria Theresa' or no.82 'L'ours' and it may be this more conventional approach that bothers you - the outer movements are the finest, the last of course for its contrapuntal mastery and that incredible coda. The first movement has a thoroughly organic structure with the motives being combined to great effect - for example the dotted motive from the first subject is used again in the 2nd subject. The tension and drama is as I mentioned earlier heightened by that bar long rest followed by the music bursting in loudly in the minor key. Then what about that delightful tune that rounds off the first section and is cleverly exploited at the opening of the development? Irresistible!

    My advice to anyone who says they don't get a piece of music is simply to stop trying! I didn't get Berlioz's Fantastique symphonie or the late Beethoven quartets for many years - I only came back to them when I felt the time was right.

    Leave a comment:


  • painter_mindscapes
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    Well I love the piece, but admittedly it isn't my favourite Mozart. Why do you pick on that opening? I can think of hundreds of pieces that start with just as banal a motive - it's what Mozart does with the material and I think it is certainly not weak, there are some very powerful moments such as after the wonderful bars silence at bar 80.
    I picked it because I read many reviews that say this is the 'ultimate' Mozart symphony and was coined 'Jupiter'. I listen to it and don't 'get it' so maybe others do who can explain why without a lot of musicologist verbiage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Originally posted by painter_mindscapes View Post
    you both missed the point of the thread.

    i posted my opinion of why i think jupiter is weak especially the opening.

    the thread is not to critique my opinion but to state your own of jupiter, 1st movement especially.
    Well I love the piece, but admittedly it isn't my favourite Mozart. Why do you pick on that opening? I can think of hundreds of pieces that start with just as banal a motive - it's what Mozart does with the material and I think it is certainly not weak, there are some very powerful moments such as after the wonderful bars silence at bar 80.

    Leave a comment:


  • painter_mindscapes
    replied
    you both missed the point of the thread.

    i posted my opinion of why i think jupiter is weak especially the opening.

    the thread is not to critique my opinion but to state your own of jupiter, 1st movement especially.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X