The 2008 winner of the once prestigious BBC young musician of the year (itself celebrating 30 years) was announced last night - 12 year old trombonist Peter Moore who really was a remarkable talent and I think deserved to win. However what a complete dumb down of the whole event by the BBC -sidelined to BBC4 none of the previous rounds were shown (as they were in previous years) and in the final itself only excerpts from concertos were played - all this accompanied by the most inane and amateurish presentation. I would go further and even question the choice of Ben Foster as chairman of the jury. And all this to 'celebrate' and encourage young classical musicians! Anyone else see this and have any thoughts?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/youngmusician/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/youngmusician/

All the focus of the presented show was on personality and repetitive back story and the music took a back seat. Even in what we saw of the judge's analysis it seemed mostly about presentation and less about technical skill or insightful interpretation than on previous occasions and would have taught few viewers any more about the pieces being played. The full performances are available on line with other information and I do think the final choice from among the finalists was right (though I thought Sam Law, the pianist of Chinese origin who won one of the lesser prizes, is probably the most insightful musician of them all and the one I think most likely to make a really distinguished career) but I feel that both the musicians and the viewers were shortchanged by this approach. Do they really think that people who are interested in Classical Music would not have the attention span to sit through 5 concerti these days (less time than a couple of tennis matches or a long opera) or that anyone they might hope to get interested would have learnt much from such a disjointed approach? Even Classic FM can be more inspirational and informative when it tries!
Comment