Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Performing Shakespeare in its original pronunciation
Collapse
X
-
Still going through all the Shakespeare plays on DVD (but not in their original olde English). Just finished "Twelfth Night". I am trying to watch them in the order in which they were written ........ which is a can of worms of a totally different colour worth two in the bush.
-
I know, I know, quoting oneself can be seen as unforgiveable vanity, but talking of pink frocks and glass shoes that fit, did I not read a year or two ago that some biographer posited that Wagner was possibly a cross dresser? Well, it does seem that he had a penchant for fine fabrics such as satin and so on ...Originally posted by Philip View PostWhat, that makes me Cindarella? Oh good, I knew that pink frock would come in use one day ...
Preston : Wagner is certainly considered a genius. Should I take his beliefs into account as I struggle to make sense of this world?
Megan : Let us sigh together.
Leave a comment:
-
All too easily,Originally posted by Peter View PostApologies but your remarks were open to such an interpretation!
.
Why?Originally posted by Philip View PostI was saying to Preston that the personal religious views of great historical figures have [corrected/edited; see below] no bearing on my own beliefs.
Leave a comment:
-
Lord, you're as incorrigible as Preston! Never mind, in my latest guise as "Mr Nice Guy" (as opposed to my former incarnation as "Forum Terrorist and Part-Time Pedant") I accept your apologies wholeheartedly.Originally posted by Peter View PostApologies but your remarks were open to such an interpretation!
Leave a comment:
-
Apologies but your remarks were open to such an interpretation!Originally posted by Philip View PostI'm afraid you have misread me. I was saying to Preston that the personal religious views of great historical figures has no bearing on my own beliefs. That their work is informed by their beliefs is of interest, clearly.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm afraid you have misread me. I was saying to Preston that the personal religious views of great historical figures have [corrected/edited; see below] no bearing on my own beliefs. That their work is informed by their beliefs is of interest, clearly.Originally posted by Peter View PostBut it should be of interest - that is a very arrogant argument to say that because you believe in nothing, others beliefs and the effect it had on their work is of no interest. What you or I do or don't believe is of no interest, but when it has a direct effect on a creative genius such as Michelangelo or Bach then it is highly relevant.Last edited by Quijote; 11-09-2010, 06:03 PM. Reason: Poor verb declination ("has" should have been "have")
Leave a comment:
-
Joy, it has been a while since you have posted! Great to hear from you!
Should your joke not read:
Why did the atheist cross not the road?
He thought there might be a sidewalk on the other side, but he wouldn’t believe it until he tested his hypothesis.
Leave a comment:



Leave a comment: