Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Performing Shakespeare in its original pronunciation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Michael
    replied
    Still going through all the Shakespeare plays on DVD (but not in their original olde English). Just finished "Twelfth Night". I am trying to watch them in the order in which they were written ........ which is a can of worms of a totally different colour worth two in the bush.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quijote
    replied
    Originally posted by Philip View Post
    What, that makes me Cindarella? Oh good, I knew that pink frock would come in use one day ...
    I know, I know, quoting oneself can be seen as unforgiveable vanity, but talking of pink frocks and glass shoes that fit, did I not read a year or two ago that some biographer posited that Wagner was possibly a cross dresser? Well, it does seem that he had a penchant for fine fabrics such as satin and so on ...
    Preston : Wagner is certainly considered a genius. Should I take his beliefs into account as I struggle to make sense of this world?
    Megan : Let us sigh together.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quijote
    replied
    Originally posted by Megan View Post
    ylniatreC pilihP.


    Sigh!
    !rrrrG ... wonk ouy, taht lla dna niotacudE

    Leave a comment:


  • Quijote
    replied
    Originally posted by Sorrano View Post
    Hey, if the shoe fits.....
    What, that makes me Cindarella? Oh good, I knew that pink frock would come in use one day ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Megan
    replied
    Originally posted by Philip View Post
    Joker you are, Joy.
    I would like too explain, but I don't have to much time.
    I'll shut up now.

    ylniatreC pilihP.


    Sigh!
    Last edited by Megan; 11-12-2010, 04:00 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quijote
    replied
    Originally posted by Joy View Post
    Huh?
    Joker you are, Joy.
    I would like too explain, but I don't have to much time.
    I'll shut up now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quijote
    replied
    Originally posted by Preston View Post
    Why?
    Independence of thought? One man's meat another man's poison?

    Leave a comment:


  • Joy
    replied
    Originally posted by Philip View Post
    Now Joy, ouy naem "ot", not "oot", ylerus?
    Huh?

    Leave a comment:


  • Preston
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    Apologies but your remarks were open to such an interpretation!
    All too easily, .
    Originally posted by Philip View Post
    I was saying to Preston that the personal religious views of great historical figures have [corrected/edited; see below] no bearing on my own beliefs.
    Why?

    Leave a comment:


  • Quijote
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    Apologies but your remarks were open to such an interpretation!
    Lord, you're as incorrigible as Preston! Never mind, in my latest guise as "Mr Nice Guy" (as opposed to my former incarnation as "Forum Terrorist and Part-Time Pedant") I accept your apologies wholeheartedly.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Originally posted by Philip View Post
    I'm afraid you have misread me. I was saying to Preston that the personal religious views of great historical figures has no bearing on my own beliefs. That their work is informed by their beliefs is of interest, clearly.
    Apologies but your remarks were open to such an interpretation!

    Leave a comment:


  • Quijote
    replied
    Originally posted by Joy View Post
    Thanks Preston! With the Holidays coming time is certainly getting away from me and I don't log on as much as I would like too!
    Now Joy, ouy naem "ot", not "oot", ylerus?

    Leave a comment:


  • Joy
    replied
    Originally posted by Preston View Post
    Joy, it has been a while since you have posted! Great to hear from you!

    Should your joke not read:
    Thanks Preston! With the Holidays coming time is certainly getting away from me and I don't log on as much as I would like too!

    Leave a comment:


  • Quijote
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    But it should be of interest - that is a very arrogant argument to say that because you believe in nothing, others beliefs and the effect it had on their work is of no interest. What you or I do or don't believe is of no interest, but when it has a direct effect on a creative genius such as Michelangelo or Bach then it is highly relevant.
    I'm afraid you have misread me. I was saying to Preston that the personal religious views of great historical figures have [corrected/edited; see below] no bearing on my own beliefs. That their work is informed by their beliefs is of interest, clearly.
    Last edited by Quijote; 11-09-2010, 06:03 PM. Reason: Poor verb declination ("has" should have been "have")

    Leave a comment:


  • Preston
    replied
    Joy, it has been a while since you have posted! Great to hear from you!

    Should your joke not read:

    Why did the atheist cross not the road?

    He thought there might be a sidewalk on the other side, but he wouldn’t believe it until he tested his hypothesis.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X