Originally posted by Megan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What are you reading now?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
There are certainly allusions that Leverkuhn (the... "protagonist"? Main character, if nothing else) was meant to be a parody of Schoenberg. In fact the whole novel is so tinted with parody of German High philosophy, as to be almost ridiculous. I am using the Ch. 8 lecture on op. 111 (itself a parody of Adorno, most likely) as the entry point to Beethoven.
Mann and Schoenberg were at least acquaintances. I remember reading somewhere that Ole' Arnie was a little put off when he first read it, until he realized just how true-to-life the facsimile was in many regards. Don't quote me on that bit though, I am not sure where I saw that.
Comment
-
It isn't that he isn't funny, it's that he isn't laugh out loud funny. More witty, biting satire. Faustus is ridiculous, more than funny.Originally posted by Peter View Postvery funny (unusually for Mann!)
[Whoops. I have clearly not had enough coffee... I didn't realize I described him as ridiculous in two different posts...]
Comment
-
Just finishing Delacroix's journal: he has some very interesting views on art and composers which I don't entirely share but I suppose they give a French mid 19th century view of things. Overall he comes across as a rather unhappy and lonely man. Next up is Bowells's London journal of 1762/3 which I'm sure will be a happier read!'Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Who needs conductors? An interesting question (and an old one, of course) that this newspaper article examines. Bonne lecture.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/20...ok-tom-service
Comment
-
Sometime last week I listened to a work performed by a conductor-less orchestra, but cannot recall who or what. Attention was drawn to the fact that the orchestra operated without a conductor and that everything seemed to go well.Originally posted by Philip View PostWho needs conductors? An interesting question (and an old one, of course) that this newspaper article examines. Bonne lecture.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/20...ok-tom-service
Comment
-
Also I seem to recall reading about a robot that conducted an orchestra and did quite well at that too.Originally posted by Sorrano View PostSometime last week I listened to a work performed by a conductor-less orchestra, but cannot recall who or what. Attention was drawn to the fact that the orchestra operated without a conductor and that everything seemed to go well.'Truth and beauty joined'
Comment
-
It covers the history and development of phrasing and articulation. In the beginning it focuses on explaining what these things are, how they are different from one another, and how they developed throughout the history of music. This includes a look at the notation, including an examination of the stroke, wedge, and dot, which was helpful. The second part of the book is a closer examination of phrasing and articulation in the works of Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven.Originally posted by Philip View PostGive us a couple of ideas from this book, would you?
Some very interesting examples are given, which I really can't reproduce without a way to easily post notation, unfortunately. Bruckner gets a few mentions in it, though, such as:
"Wagner has, in his orchestral language, increased to the ultimate the reach of his 'endless melody' by ceaseless phrase-linkages from one instrument to another. Bruckner did not follow his master Wagner in this respect, but, for the most part, lets one theme die away completely before a new one arises; Reger, on the other hand, with his motifs organized from small elements is, in phrasing, to be considered a disciple of Brahms."
Comment

Comment