Beethoven's F minor string quartet, described by some writer as "the bitter fruit of a barren year". It is indeed bitter but, paradoxically, incredibly beautiful. It was so experimental (even for Beethoven) that he originally intended it to be played only among his musical friends - and not for general consumption.
It is so strange that some music critics consign it to the middle period and others bundle it with the late quartets. It is unique.
I have loved it since I first heard it over forty years ago and for the past few weeks I have been playing through eight different recordings of this work. I never tire of it.
(But don't mind me. I have a one track mind. )
Beethoven's F minor string quartet, described by some writer as "the bitter fruit of a barren year". It is indeed bitter but, paradoxically, incredibly beautiful. It was so experimental (even for Beethoven) that he originally intended it to be played only among his musical friends - and not for general consumption.
It is so strange that some music critics consign it to the middle period and others bundle it with the late quartets. It is unique.
I have loved it since I first heard it over forty years ago and for the past few weeks I have been playing through eight different recordings of this work. I never tire of it.
(But don't mind me. I have a one track mind. )
No - I never heard that before. Thanks, Peter. That will bring my total up to nine!
The arrangement takes some of the bite out of the original, though, just like the similar arrangement of the Grosse Fugue.
I'm confused! When I click on the YouTube link that Peter gave it says that this is an arrangement by M. Waterman, not Mahler.
I also have to ask what "real changes" are made in such an arrangement. OK, I can see that there is a double bass which obviously doubles the cello part (more "piano left hand" octave doublings, I suppose), but really what has the arranger done that is noteworthy? For sure it represents an economic burden: you need to engage a conductor to coordinate the orchestrata !!
Did the arranger "rewrite" the original four string parts in any way? I would need to check the score to be sure and I don't have the inclination to be honest but if you happen to know I'd be curious to find out. Thanks!
I'm confused! When I click on the YouTube link that Peter gave it says that this is an arrangement by M. Waterman, not Mahler.
I also have to ask what "real changes" are made in such an arrangement. OK, I can see that there is a double bass which obviously doubles the cello part (more "piano left hand" octave doublings, I suppose), but really what has the arranger done that is noteworthy? For sure it represents an economic burden: you need to engage a conductor to coordinate the orchestrata !!
Did the arranger "rewrite" the original four string parts in any way? I would need to check the score to be sure and I don't have the inclination to be honest but if you happens to know I'd be curious to find out. Thanks!
Don't be confused - this was my mistake as I was aware that Mahler arranged this for string orchestra mostly by doubling some of the cello parts with double basses, so I assumed this was his.
I have other questions about such a venture. If I were to write an arrangement of any of Beethoven's string quartets, my first question to myself would be "why?". OK, why not try and arrange it for a 2-piano version, that could work. Or a fully orchestrated version, that would be a challenge! Imagine trying to arrange certain passages for the wind and brass - that would really offer an arranger's vision of the work. I think we should ask Gerd !!!
I have other questions about such a venture. If I were to write an arrangement of any of Beethoven's string quartets, my first question to myself would be "why?". OK, why not try and arrange it for a 2-piano version, that could work. Or a fully orchestrated version, that would be a challenge! Imagine trying to arrange certain passages for the wind and brass - that would really offer an arranger's vision of the work. I think we should ask Gerd !!!
Why? Because we want more Beethoven. As we don't have any MORE Beethoven, we adapt the music that we already have.
Why? Because we want more Beethoven. As we don't have any MORE Beethoven, we adapt the music that we already have.
You mean we have pizza margharita and you want other versions? Sounds good to me. But no pineapple, please - that is an inauthentic addition to the basic mix.
Megan, an amusing coincidence occurred after I listened to the above song. I switched over to another station and they were playing the end of the second movement of the Pastoral symphony and I heard the nightingale again (along with the quail and the cuckoo!)
Incidentally, a lot of people I know think Beethoven is for the birds but did anyone ever ask him what the nightingale was doing singing in the middle of the day?
Edit: I am not making this up but half an hour later on the radio what came on but Michael Buble singing "A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square". Seriously.
I'm getting freaked out.
Megan, an amusing coincidence occurred after I listened to the above song. I switched over to another station and they were playing the end of the second movement of the Pastoral symphony and I heard the nightingale again (along with the quail and the cuckoo!)
Incidentally, a lot of people I know think Beethoven is for the birds but did anyone ever ask him what the nightingale was doing singing in the middle of the day?
Edit: I am not making this up but half an hour later on the radio what came on but Michael Buble singing "A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square". Seriously.
I'm getting freaked out.
.
I must listen again to Beethoven's Pastoral Symphony
I don't know which station you must have been listening to , to hear the American Michael Buble sing a rather jazzy version of that aforementioned song. How strange. I have never heard of him, he seem like the new Frank Sinatra swooner in town. .
I must listen again to Beethoven's Pastoral Symphony
I don't know which station you must have been listening to , to hear the American Michael Buble sing a rather jazzy version of that aforementioned song. How strange. I have never heard of him, he seem like the new Frank Sinatra swooner in town. .
.
He is damn good if you like big band music and also a very amusing character.
(Actually, I'm assuming it was Buble as I didn't hear the presenter. It could have been Harry Connick Jr or Bobby Darin. It wasn't Frank anyway.)
It was on our main Irish radio station before the news at one and it made my third nightingale this morning!
I'm afraid to turn on BBC radio in case the next thing is I hear Anne Nightingale.
I ordered this CD and I enjoyed listening to it very much. I didn't even mind the vibrato in the oboe! Perhaps he/she was a bit nervous? I do think it surpasses the DG recording, although both are really great. It's a real gem. Thanks for posting!
Comment