so what do you think of this AMAZING sonata???
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
thoughts on "Appassionata"?
Collapse
X
-
If I had the technical capability I don't think I would have the emotional stamina to play through it--especially that last movement. I like your description of the last chord.Originally posted by PDG:
Well, I think I like it!! The thrilling climax is equalled only by the one of Op.110 in my view. Such driven intensity, I have to stand up to listen to it. The final F minor chord sounds like the slamming shut of a coffin lid.
Comment
-
Well you are right - it is amazing! Several facts, it is the first of the sonatas in which the exposition is not repeated (Beethoven also did this with the 1st of the Razumovsky quartets). The title 'Appassionata' (like the 'Moonlight') was not Beethoven's but the publisher's (Cranz). Beethoven had originally written the first movement in 4/4 time but changed the metre to 12/8 - a subtle difference which implies the Allegro assai referring to the quaver note instead of the crotchet - ie a slightly slower tempo which heightens the drama by bringing out the quaver triplet beats.Originally posted by KyleC:
so what do you think of this AMAZING sonata???
------------------
'Man know thyself''Man know thyself'
Comment
-
Also, in the finale, the development and recapitulation are (or should be) repeated which gives an added air of endless desperation to the movement.Originally posted by Peter:
Well you are right - it is amazing! Several facts, it is the first of the sonatas in which the exposition is not repeated (Beethoven also did this with the 1st of the Razumovsky quartets).
Michael
Comment

Comment